Svyatoslav Gulin vs Oliwier Sterniczuk Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Svyatoslav Gulin has performed slightly better on second serves, winning 46.79% of points compared to Oliwier Sterniczuk's 44.71%. How does this impact predictions? It often suggests a stronger serve under pressure.
• Gulin also excels in returning second serves, securing 41.87% of opponent's second serve points against Sterniczuk's 38.98%. This can be crucial for breaking an opponent's serve.
• Interestingly, for first serve returns, Sterniczuk is more successful, with a win rate of 32.11% versus Gulin’s 29.65%. Could this mean highlighting Sterniczuk’s potential in returning powerful serves?
• Under pressure, Gulin shows greater resilience, saving 50.81% of breakpoints compared to Sterniczuk’s 27.78%. This is pivotal when predicting match outcomes.
• Over the past year, Gulin boasts a win rate of 74.03% while Sterniczuk lags with 38.46%. What might this suggest for their head-to-head challenge? Perhaps, a high predictor of overall success.
• Clay is favored by both players, but Gulin’s impressive 71% win rate (180/73) outshines Sterniczuk’s identical percentage over fewer matches (5/9). Could surface preference play a deciding role?
• In lower-tier tournaments, Gulin dominates with a 76.81% win rate, while Sterniczuk records 41.67%. This difference in competition level may influence predictions.
• Despite Gulin's opponents averaging a rank of 488.34 and Sterniczuk's at 122.15, Gulin still emerges as a formidable competitor, reflecting a significant achievement.
• In deciding sets, Gulin is reliable, winning 67% of matches, with Sterniczuk yet to claim any. Is the ability to close matches a crucial edge here?

Editorial Prediction (November 15, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing their recent performances, Svyatoslav Gulin and Oliwier Sterniczuk demonstrate distinct strengths and weaknesses. Gulin's slightly superior second serve performance coupled with his efficiency at winning points on return games indicates a formidable edge.

Breakpoints saved under pressure significantly favor Gulin, suggesting psychological resilience, which is essential in tight matches. Although Sterniczuk displays better statistics against powerful serves, his overall win percentage in the past year is overshadowed by Gulin’s dominance.

Both players enjoy success on clay, yet Gulin's extensive experience and higher win percentages suggest an advantage on this surface. The difference in competition level appears significant, favoring Gulin who consistently performs well in similar scenarios.

If the match extends to a deciding set, Gulin's impressive track record could play a critical role. Ultimately, based on these comparative insights, Svyatoslav Gulin is likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.